Association analysis of prolactin and prolactin receptor genes with selected productive and reproductive traits in Egyptian buffalo.

A total of 266 records of buffalo raised in two experimental herds in Egypt were assessed to detect prolactin (PRL) and prolactin receptor (PRLR) genes' polymorphism using PCR-Single Strand Conformational Polymorphism (SSCP) and PCR-Restricted Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) techniques as well as to investigate their association with calf birth weight (BW), weaning weight (WW), lactation period (LP), total milk yield (TMY), stillbirth, calving ease (CE), gestation length (GL), postpartum interval to pregnancy (PPIP), calving interval (CI), and age at first calving (AFC). Predicted breeding values were estimated and used in the association with detected genotypes. A monomorphic pattern of the studied PRL 156 bp segment was recorded and absence of its polymorphism in buffalo was corroborated. We also determined polymorphism of PRLR reflected in three loci: PRLR2, PRLR4, and PRLR9. Significant differences among PRLP9 genotypes (AA, AB, and BB) were displayed for all studied traits as well as among PRLR2 genotypes, except for CE, while PRLR4 genotypes significantly differed only in BW, WW, TMY, stillbirth, GL, and AFC. In practice, strong associations among genotypes of the PRLR gene and the traits of interest candidate this gene to be selective in Egyptian buffalo breeding for improving both productive and reproductive traits.

Genetic parameters and principal components analysis of breeding value for birth and weaning weight in Egyptian buffalo.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the current study were to study the main environmental factors affecting birth weight (BW) and weaning weight (WW), estimate variance components, genetic parameters and genetic trend and to evaluate the variability and relationships among breeding value of BW and WW using principal components analysis (PCA). METHODS: A total of 16,370 records were collected from 8,271 buffalo calves. Genetic parameters and breeding values were estimated using a bivariate animal model which includes direct, maternal and permanent maternal effects. These estimates were standardized and used in PCA. RESULTS: The direct heritability estimates were 0.06 and 0.41 for BW and WW, respectively whereas direct maternal heritability values were 0.03 and 0.14, respectively. Proportions of variance due to permanent environmental effects of dam were 0.455 and 0.280 for BW and WW respectively. The genetic correlation between BW and WWs was weak approaching zero, but the maternal correlation was 0.26. The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) were estimated utilizing the standardized breeding values according to Kaiser method. The total variance explained by the first two PCs was 71.17% in which 45.91% and 25.25% were explained by PC1 and PC2, respectively. The direct breeding values of BW were related to PC2 but those of WW and maternal breeding values of BW and WWs were associated with PC1. CONCLUSION: The results of genetic parameters and PCA indicate that BW and WWs were not genetically correlated and improving growth traits of Egyptian buffaloes could be achieved using WW without any adverse effect by BW.